Maguire Linked to Two More Spider-Man Films
Monday September 8, 2008

Fellow superheroes Robert Downey Jr. and Tobey Maguire meet on the red carpet for the premiere of Downey's film
Tropic Thunder.
© Kevin Winter/Getty ImagesTrade papers are reporting that Sony Pictures is about to resign Tobey Maguire for two further
Spider-Man films, to be filmed as a single production starting sometime next fall.
Sony was seeking to quash reports it was considering replacing Maguire, especially in light of hints from Maguire himself that he was interested in moving on (so he must be getting a big payday if he inks for
4 and
5). "The studio never considered any other actor. Tobey was our only choice and the only person we've discussed the role with," Sony spokesman Steve Elzer said.
Producer Laura Ziskin said the expected release date for
Spider-Man 4 would be May 2011. The studio is also in talks with director Sam Raimi, and while his involvement has not been confirmed it is widely expected. So far there's no word on whether other cast members, including Kirsten Dunst (Mary Jane Watson), Rosemary Harris (May Parker), J.K. Simmons (J. Jonah Jameson), Dylan Baker (Dr. Curt Connors), and Bryce Dallas Howard (Gwen Stacy), would return for the new sequels, or who the villains would be.
A continuation of the series was pretty likely, given the phenomenal success of Marvel Studios and that fact that it was all built on the
Spider-Man franchise.
Spider-Man 3 was the highest grossing of the three films (although the lowest grossing domestically), but was not widely praised by critics; I expect a lot of fans, myself included, are a little uneasy that the studio might grind out sequels even more compromised than
3, with its inelegantly shoe-horned-in treatment of Venom in what was supposed to be a Sandman movie. Maguire's performance was not his most nuanced, and was not helped by some face-on shots that made him look a little doughy.
Still,
Spider-Man 3 had a lot going for it and set up some great possibilities for the future, particularly the usually tragic fate in store for Gwen Stacy (though it differs in the various versions of
Spider-Man comics; and the long set-up for the Lizard seems likely to pay off.
Is this a Sci-Fi "Golden Age"?
Monday September 8, 2008
In an interview last week, Fringe creator/executive producer J.J. Abrams was asked whether the evidence of big-buzz, high-gloss sci-fi shows like Fringe, Heroes, Lost, and Battlestar Galactica suggested that we might be living in "almost the golden age of sci-fi." (The question came from Niagara-area entertainment reporter Joshua Maloni.)
This is an interesting question, because it seems like TV sci-fi / fantasy is riding high right now. In addition to the shows mentioned to Abrams, there's a whole raft of serious, well-crafted sci-fi being produced today -- shows as different as Supernatural and Pushing Daisies are being carefully made and attracting both casual and devoted weekly viewers. Outside the U.S., shows like Doctor Who and Torchwood have created a new interest in sci-fi that's aggressively aimed not at the geeks but at regular viewers, affecting and sometimes effecting the development of shows like Primeval and Robin Hood in past seasons and upcoming ventures like Merlin. (Abrams was also asked about the increasingly high proportion of imports and how it further shrinks the window of opportunity for aspiring writers.)
Part of this sci-fi resurgence on TV is related to the massive success of summer blockbuster sci-fi movies in recent years, primarily in comic-book-based films like The Dark Knight and Iron Man and movies that could have been based on comic books, like Transformers.
But does this constitute a golden age? There's a certain loudness to the summer popcorn blockbuster that isn't quite the same as a Blade Runner or a 2001 -- though there are certainly exceptions: Dark Knight has lots of explosions but is one of the more intensely thoughtful movies of the year.
Meanwhile is the Emmys' partial recognition of Pushing Daisies grounds for applause, or a stark reminder of how the rest of the high-quality sci-fi we've been talking about was ignored for acting and directing? And if I ponder the depth of a golden age that fosters a slew of great shows but also allows certain pet favorites of mine, like the serious fantasies Journeyman and New Amsterdam, to die on the vine only to be replaced by the crass guilty pleasure of Knight Rider, is that valid concern -- or sour grapes?
Atlantis's Fifth Season Will Be Its Last
Sunday August 31, 2008

Joseph Mallozzi
© MGMJoseph Mallozzi, one of the show-runners for
Stargate Atlantis, has confirmed in
his blog that the show's currently airing fifth season will be its last.
"We came into this year knowing that renewal would be a longshot," Mallozzi said. "With 100 episodes under our belts, rising production costs, and the US dollar's steep decline, the odds were stacked against us." (Factored into the economic picture is the particular problem of rising cast salaries once a show passes the syndication-minimum hundred episodes.) Still, it was not until this month that the Sci Fi network let them know the series would not be picked up for a season.
Read more...
Studios Slug It Out over Watchmen
Saturday August 30, 2008

Billy Crudup in
Watchmen.
© Warner Brothers PicturesNo sooner do we get the luscious trailer for
Watchmen, Zack Snyder's big-screen adaptation of the seminal graphic novel, than the actual release of the film itself next March gets called into question, much to the dismay of its potential audience.
20th Century Fox, which says it owns the rights to
Watchmen, is seeking an injunction to stop Warner Brothers from distributing the film – even though Fox apparently passed on the project and stood by while it first allowed the producer, Lawrence Gordon, to shop it to other studios, and then watched Warners actually sink $100 million into the picture.
The wrangling is mired in Hollywood contract-ese, but the upshot is
Watchmen's release, after 20 years of development hell, could be further delayed while the two studios fight over points and profits on a very hot commodity that both studios are no doubt hoping will be the next
Dark Knight.
Variety aired speculation that Fox preferred to see
Watchmen canned rather than not get a percentage, promoting threats of boycotts against upcoming Fox projects like
The Day the Earth Stood Still and
X-Men: Wolverine.
Read more...